+2 For Tobie's solution as well...
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Allen Madsen <bla...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 for what tobie said. I would prefer not to have extra $ method's that do > the same thing if possible. > Thanks, > > Allen Madsen > http://www.allenmadsen.com > > > > On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 5:32 AM, Tobie Langel <tobie.lan...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> >> A more elegant solution to this problem is to use a closure around the >> library, avoid using free variables internally and define an numbers >> of exports for external consumption. >> >> Such changes are planned for Prototype 2.0. >> >> Hopes this helps. >> >> Best, >> >> Tobie >> >> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prototype: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-core@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-core-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
