On Nov 7, 12:24 am, "T.J. Crowder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Yes I know this possibility. I though about it, but I can not use
> > it... and I don't think the bind problem will be fix in that way ;)
>
> I'm pretty sure it will. Did you try it? I did a trivial test, and
> it worked fine. Here's my version of moveDown, which differs slightly
> from Rob's as it uses Prototype-isms:
It's a little bit different, it expects elm to be the element to be
moved, whereas what I posted expects the event to come from an element
inside the element to be moved, e.g.:
<div onclick="moveDown(this);">
<button ...> ... </button>
</div>
<div onclick="moveDown(this);">
<button ...> ... </button>
</div>
>
> function moveDown(elm)
> {
> var next;
>
> elm = $(elm);
> next = elm.next();
> if (next)
> {
> elm.remove();
> next.insert({after: elm});
I don't think there's any need to remove then insert, you can just
insert the node in the new location. Coupled with a bit of standard
DOM, there's no need for the if statement - the entire block can be
replaced with:
elm.parentNode.insertBefore(elm, next.nextSibling);
and the function becomes:
function moveDown(el) {
var next = $(el).next();
el.parentNode.insertBefore(el, next.nextSibling);
}
Each to their own. :-)
--
Rob
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
