On Jan 22, 7:18 pm, Richard Quadling <[email protected]> wrote: > 2009/1/22 Matt Foster <[email protected]>: [...] > I completely misread the Array.without(). I saw the individual > elements and I must have had a brain fart.
You can, of course, always use `Function.prototype.apply` as a "workaround" : ) var set1 = [1,2,3,4]; var set2 = [1,3]; var subset = set1.without.apply(set1, set2); // etc. [...] -- kangax --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prototype & script.aculo.us" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
