Hi T.J.

On Jan 19, 12:31 pm, "T.J. Crowder" <t...@crowdersoftware.com> wrote:
> > On my machine, the DOM version takes at least 10 times longer than the
> > HTML version.

Did you use "prototype DOM" (x=new Element('P',{...});...) or "plain
old vanilla DOM" (x=document.createElement('P');...) ?

I was thinking to revert to vanilla DOM for performances issues but I
may revert to build some HTML string if it is that fast :o)
(Isn't it what scritaculous's Builder is doing internally?)

Eric

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to