On Wednesday 18 February 2009 15:53:08 Brendan O Connor wrote:
> run the the same function again using -xCo
>
> I use the following
>
> moveRight : function(mvePan,xCo){
>
>
> menuFrag.scrollCnt = menuFrag.scrollCnt + 1;
> new Effect.Move(mvePan, {duration: .5,
> x: xCo, y: 0, mode: 'relative',
> transition: Effect.Transitions.sinoidal
> },{queue:'front'});
> },
>
> moveLeft : function(mvePan,xCo){
> xCo = xCo*-1;
> menuFrag.scrollCnt = menuFrag.scrollCnt - 1;
> new Effect.Move(mvePan, {duration: .5,
> x: xCo, y: 0, mode: 'relative',
> transition: Effect.Transitions.sinoidal
> },{afterFinish:myCallBack});
> }
> },
That's pretty much what I'm doing now, but for big parallel effects with lots
of different morphs it would be neater to be able to do something like this:
{
transition: forwards? Effect.Transitions.sunoidal :
Effect.Transitions.reverse(sunoidal)
}
than have to worry about negating all the different morph parameters.
Maybe I should just have a go at hacking a reverse function into
Effect.Transitions.
--
Jim
my wiki ajaxification thing: http://wikizzle.org
my blog: http://jimhigson.blogspot.com/
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
