ioustinos wrote: > I have been using scriptaculous in one application of mine. > Everything runs smoothly. > Then i added the builder.js and changed the inclusion line into this > <script type="text/javascript" src="js/scriptaculous.js? > load=effects,dragdrop,controls,builder"></script> >
Just a guess, but might be worth checking: Try putting the "builder" in front of "effects" in the load parameter. As far as I know the order in which the libraries ar loaded is important. <script type="text/javascript" src="js/scriptaculous.js? load=builder,effects,dragdrop,controls"></script> I think that if scriptaculous is loading the libraries itself, it should force the correct order, but It might not, I have never tried it. I am sure it is important if you load all the files separately. Take a look at unofficial wiki: http://proto-scripty.wikidot.com/scripty:tip-minimum-libraries-for-effects Best Regards, SWilk --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prototype & script.aculo.us" group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---