At 10:01 -0400 29/5/09, Mitchell McCulloch wrote: >Ah! I didn't look too closely at that I guess, whoops. Indeed that should >solve the problem for Chris.
No problem for me - at least, not /that/ problem. :-) I was the one who suggested he had the filename wrong when he didn't. The original problem was Alex's, and I hadn't noticed the lack of a </script> either. I guess it may depend on how forgiving the browser is, but certainly if I remove it from one of my applications Firefox 3 doesn't like it. Could well be the answer then. -- Cheers... Chris Highway 57 Web Development -- http://highway57.co.uk/ A double negative is strictly a no-no --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prototype & script.aculo.us" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
