Hello-

I was wondering if you could please tell me where in the documentation
you found this.  There is very little about destroy() that I can
find.  In fact, I only found a single mention of it on the "draggable"
page.

Also, I tried the bit of code you posted and it does not seem to be
working for me.  I can repeatedly drag the same object around.

Thank-you for any additional insight.


On Aug 14, 1:48 pm, nimzo <[email protected]> wrote:
> More glances at the documentation led me to this:
>
> onEnd: function(d) {
>         Draggables.drags.each(function(draggable) {
>                 draggable.destroy();
>         })
>
> },
>
> ... and it worked. Apparently, there is already a reference
> to all the draggables on the page. Thanks for your help.
>
> On Aug 14, 4:36 am, "Alex McAuley" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Speed up was the wrong term - which i realised when i pressed "Send"
>
> > Alex Mcauleyhttp://www.thevacancymarket.com
>
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "T.J. Crowder" <[email protected]>
> > To: "Prototype & script.aculo.us" <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Friday, August 14, 2009 12:17 PM
> > Subject: [Proto-Scripty] Re: How to disable draggables in script.aculo.us
>
> > Alex,
>
> > > It seems bizzare to me that...you are still using vanilla JS methods to
> > > select dom
> > > nodes/elements.
>
> > > speed your code up with.
>
> > It may be more expressive, shorter, more elegant, more maintainable,
> > etc., but _speedier_ it ain't. ;-)  You're suggesting two things:
>
> > A) That he bypass what is in most cases a built-in compiled
> > optimisation of a common selector use case (find by class name) in
> > favor of using something interpreted and via the notoriously slow DOM
> > API.
>
> > and
>
> > B) That he introduce several completely unnecessary function calls
> > (#each and its callbacks).
>
> > That will not speed up his code.
>
> > For instance, on Firefox 3 for Windows, $$ is more than an order of
> > magnitude (!) slower than getElementsByClassName (both 1.6.0.3 and
> > 1.6.1; the latter surprised me) for the one use case where
> > getElementsByClassName is useful; in my ad hoc tests between 12x and
> > 25x slower.  Even on IE7 (where getElementsByClassName is not native,
> > it's supplied by Prototype), $$ is somewhere between slightly slower
> > and twice as slow because it has to deal with a lot more complexity.
>
> > Separately, #each is appropriate only for looping small enumerations
> > (which, granted, this one probably is), or where time isn't critical
> > (and given that JavaScript has only one thread, time is pretty much
> > always critical).  They may not be l33t, but the fastest way *by far*
> > to loop through an array is a boring old-fashioned for loop.  I mean,
> > again, we're into orders of magnitude here, 20-25x slower.  This will
> > continue to be the case at least until #each is directly supported by
> > the JavaScript interpreter (which is coming!), and even then only if
> > its JIT compiling can factor out the function call on each iteration
> > (which in many cases we can expect it will).
>
> > Now, if browsers were way fast, it wouldn't matter much.  But the fact
> > is, right now, we're dealing with a slow environment, hugely slow in
> > the case of the majority browser, IE.  The freakishly fast Chrome is
> > helping set the stage for that to change, but as we know, these things
> > change slowly.
>
> > So...let's not tell him to "speed up" his code in ways that will
> > demonstrably slow it down, eh? ;-)  There are lots of reasons to use $
> > $ (not least almost complete support for CSS3!), and separately for
> > using #each (more expressive IMV, less error-prone), but speed isn't
> > on either list.
>
> > Happy coding,
> > --
> > T.J. Crowder
> > tj / crowder software / com
> > Independent Software Engineer, consulting services available
>
> > On Aug 14, 11:03 am, "Alex McAuley" <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > Nizmo...
>
> > > It seems bizzare to me that you are using Draggables (which relies on
> > > prototypejs) yet you are still using vanilla JS methods to select dom
> > > nodes/elements.
>
> > > speed your code up with.
>
> > > $$('.box').each(function(element) {
>
> > > new Draggable(element, {ghosting:true})
>
> > > });
>
> > > //
>
> > > HTH
>
> > > Alex Mcauleyhttp://www.thevacancymarket.com
>
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "nimzo" <[email protected]>
> > > To: "Prototype & script.aculo.us"
> > > <[email protected]>
> > > Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2009 9:36 PM
> > > Subject: [Proto-Scripty] How to disable draggables in script.aculo.us
>
> > > > Hi-
>
> > > > I'm trying to make a group of objects draggable as you can see below -
> > > > easy enough. But I'd like to configure things so that at the very
> > > > moment any one of these items is dragged, the others automatically
> > > > cease to be draggable. Does anyone know how to do this?
>
> > > > var products = document.getElementsByClassName('box');
> > > > for (var i = 0; i < products.length; i++) {
> > > > new Draggable(products[i].id, {ghosting:true})
> > > > }
>
> > > > Thanks very much.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to