My crude-imentary tests are on my Win7 laptop using Wamp, which means
mod_deflate. Work server is Cent, but i don't know whether it's got
any compression modules enabled (i've tried with the admin, he
slacks).
-joe t.


On Dec 12, 4:17 am, "Alex McAuley" <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Joe.
>
> Are you using ob_gz_handler(); or mod_defalte / mod_gzip ?
>
> Also is  it a winblows or *nix server
>
> Alex Mcauleyhttp://www.thevacancymarket.com
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "joe t." <[email protected]>
> To: "Prototype & script.aculo.us" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Saturday, December 12, 2009 2:24 AM
> Subject: [Proto-Scripty] Re: Progressive update messages from single request
>
> Alex,
> Thanks for the sample. i must be missing a piece somewhere 
> though...http://pastie.org/739926
>
> From that single Ajax.Request, the client delays, and after the PHP is
> done running, i get the complete output in one block. What i'd
> anticipated was that in each loop, the flush() would somehow send that
> output to the client where it could be used, then the next loop's
> flush would send another output to the client...
>
> If i'm understanding it, Ajax is a single-request-single-response. i
> can't output the current step a process is in as it happens. i can
> accumulate them, as your model shows, and dump that out as a log, of
> sorts. But in order to monitor progress of one request's processing on
> the server, a series of follow-ups have to get feedback which the
> original is providing on the side (as T.J. recommended).
>
> Unless i'm missing something, which would be great if you could help
> me fill that in. :)
> -joe t.
>
> On Dec 11, 3:29 am, "Alex McAuley" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > in your ajax request file
>
> > <?php
> > ini_set('output_buffering',0); // make sure the output_buffering directive
> > is not set high
> > ob_start(); // before anything is echoed to the screen
>
> > for($i=0;$i<10;$i++)
> > {
> > echo('<li>Printing Line '.$i.'</li>');
> > ob_flush();
> > flush();
>
> > sleep(1); // sleep for one second
>
> > }
>
> > ?>
> > this will output a line every second for 10 seconds
>
> > Hope this helps
>
> > P.S if you use ob_gz_handler this may not work (untested using it)
>
> > Alex Mcauleyhttp://www.thevacancymarket.com
>
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "joe t." <[email protected]>
> > To: "Prototype & script.aculo.us"
> > <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Friday, December 11, 2009 1:00 AM
> > Subject: [Proto-Scripty] Re: Progressive update messages from single
> > request
>
> > david:
> > The buffer/flush path seems to be where this solution is heading.
> > Don't ask me why, but iframes rub me the wrong way. With the evolving
> > needs for more streamlined connections, iframes feel like soggy
> > bandaids to me. Given they have a place where nothing else seems to
> > work (Ajax-ish file uploads), but i'd prefer to steer away from them
> > in this case if i can.
>
> > TJ:
> > That seems like a fairly solid idea. Same general concept of having a
> > second request object checking in on progress that the server reports
> > back, it just gets it from a relatively more reliable source (instead
> > of $_SESSION).
>
> > Alex:
> > Could you elaborate a bit, or point me to where i can follow up on
> > that? i'm intrigued, but i'm not deeply familiar with using the output
> > buffer effectively.
>
> > Thanks for the replies!
> > -joe t.
>
> > On Dec 10, 3:45 am, "Alex McAuley" <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > I noticed you were using PHP on the server side ... you can also use
> > > output
> > > buffering to achieve this in one request
>
> > > Alex Mcauleyhttp://www.thevacancymarket.com
>
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "T.J. Crowder" <[email protected]>
> > > To: "Prototype & script.aculo.us"
> > > <[email protected]>
> > > Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 8:38 AM
> > > Subject: [Proto-Scripty] Re: Progressive update messages from single
> > > request
>
> > > Hi Joe,
>
> > > It seems to me the simple way to do this is have the first request
> > > initiate a process on the server that keeps running when the request
> > > completes; the request returns an indicator of the current status and
> > > an identifier for the action.
>
> > > Your subsequent requests supply the identifer, which allows the server-
> > > side page to check the progress of the ongoing work matching that ID
> > > and report back the (new) status.
>
> > > People use things like this for showing progress bars for file uploads
> > > without using Flash, that kind of thing.
>
> > > HTH,
> > > --
> > > T.J. Crowder
> > > Independent Software Consultant
> > > tj / crowder software / comwww.crowdersoftware.com
>
> > > On Dec 9, 4:11 pm, "joe t." <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > i think i've seen examples of this, but can't recall where, and could
> > > > use some guidance.
>
> > > > Obviously it's easy to handle a 1:1 Request/Response
>
> > > > How can i do a true 1:many process? For instance:
> > > > Client takes a single action which requires the server to perform 3
> > > > tasks:
> > > > * Query database
> > > > * Generate PDF
> > > > * Generate email, attach PDF, and send
>
> > > > How can i respond to the client as EACH task is accomplished without
> > > > ending the request chain?
> > > > "Looking up your data . . ." (time-based dots as delay indicator)
> > > > "Creating PDF . . ."
> > > > "Email sent" (or failed, as the case may be)
>
> > > > Is this done with HTTP 2xx headers? Recursive callbacks? If anyone can
> > > > point me in the right direction (which include samples), i'd be
> > > > grateful.
>
> > > > Thanks.
> > > > -joe t.
>
> > > --
>
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > > Groups
> > > "Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
> > > To post to this group, send email to
> > > [email protected].
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > [email protected].
> > > For more options, visit this group
> > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
>
> > --
>
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to
> > [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > [email protected].
> > For more options, visit this group
> > athttp://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
>
> --
>
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
> To post to this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group 
> athttp://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
>
>

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.


Reply via email to