I mention line 4 because I am actually stepping through the code and
on line 4, so after entering the #each, my row object goes missing.
I don't understand it at all. There must be something else wrong I
guess. Ugg, this is a real hold up at the moment.
Karl..
On Sep 2, 3:28 am, "T.J. Crowder" <t...@crowdersoftware.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > On line 4, if I examine the row object, it simply does not exist.
>
> When you're doing that, do you mean `row` or `this`? You're not using
> `row` on line 4.
>
> From what you've quoted, I don't see any reason `this` or `row` would
> be different inside the #each call from outside it. You're correctly
> passing `this` to #each to set context, and the iterator closes over
> `row`.
>
> Without more context (no pun), can't really see what's wrong...
>
> FWIW,
> --
> T.J. Crowder
> Independent Software Consultant
> tj / crowder software / comwww.crowdersoftware.com
>
> On Sep 2, 6:48 am, kstubs <kst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > I am losing the context of the row object parameter as in this
> > example:
>
> > 1. loadTable: function(row, itt)
> > 2. {
> > 3. this.HEAD.each(function(head, itt2) {
> > 4. var cellNode = this.getCell(itt, itt2);
> > 5. if(cellNode)
> > 6. cellNode.innerHTML = row[head.text];
> > 7. }, this);
> > 8. }
>
> > On line 4, if I examine the row object, it simply does not exist.
> > What am I doing wrong?
>
> > Karl..
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
