Browsers are getting faster, and I am finding that it is far quicker to pass data back as json, then use a JS templating engine to covert the data into its HTML representation on the user's side.
On Nov 15, 11:43 am, Jimmy Brake <[email protected]> wrote: > What you said is mostly true on both accounts. What I like about the > straight json method is I can dump pretty much all the data they would use > over the entire course of the session in just one response probably no more > than 40 k for really large data sets. > > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Victor <[email protected]> wrote: > > So you plan to receive JSON from server, then convert it to HTML and > > insert into page? HTML fragments are much easier in > > writing/validating/processing. > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Prototype & script.aculo.us" group. > > To view this discussion on the web visit > >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/prototype-scriptaculous/-/DAxhHxaBOFkJ. > > To post to this group, send email to > > [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]. > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prototype & script.aculo.us" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
