John Darrington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm wondering if there's a better way we can implement the /MISSING > subcommand which appears in nearly all of the stats commands. > Currently, it's up to each procedure to explicitly implement it, which > is both a pain and error prone. > > Perhaps we could pass a parameter to the case_reader when its > constructed so that it returns only the appropriate cases?
How about writing a function to do this that can be used by each procedure after calling casereader_read()? I'm not sure that this really belongs in the case_reader: currently it doesn't have any knowledge about what's in the data it's dealing with. -- "Because computer source code is an expressive means for the exchange of information and ideas about computer programming, we hold that it is protected by the First Amendment." --Hon. Boyce F. Martin, Jr., for the 6th Circuit Court, Junger vs. Daley _______________________________________________ pspp-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-dev
