On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 02:17:43PM +0800, John Darrington wrote: > On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 09:53:12AM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote: > I'm beginning to wonder whether it would be better to check in > the set of changes we have now. It has changed from being a > brief "reorganization" to a major code cleanup. That's not > necessarily a bad thing, but it means that it becomes more > difficult to coordinate. CVS isn't perfect but it does make it > easier to coordinate changes. > > We don't have to get the file names perfect yet. As long as a > ChangeLog exists to explain what's been done (I assume you'll be > adding your own ChangeLog entries before you check in), we can > figure out what happened over a series of renames. > > Also I worry about becoming less transparent to outsiders. > Anyone who looks at the CVS tree at the moment will think nothing > much is going on. That's certainly not true. > > I dunno. What do you guys think? > > > Let's do the renaming, as good as we reasonably can, and then > check-in. > > Oh, and can we make a decision about lib/linreg ? I'm of the opinion > that everything except sweep.[ch] should be moved to src/math
Do you mean to make a directory called src/math/linreg with all the linreg code in it, or just mv lib/linreg/* src/math/ ? (With the exception of sweep.) -Jason -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org _______________________________________________ pspp-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-dev
