On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 04:02:46AM +0000, Ben Pfaff wrote:
Is the datasheet.c assertion correct? I think that the test
should be "<=" not "<".
I don't think so. axis_get_cnt returns the number of columns, not the
highest column number ?
It seems to me that it's only appropriate in the
particular case where the data is coming from something like a datasheet,
where the case data is automatically rearranged as the dictionary is
manipulated. And in that case, I don't understand why just doing
set_var_width as-is and then dict_compact on its dictionary wouldn't have
the
same effect.
The problem with dict_compact is that it can change the order of the
case indices, which would put the datasheet and the dictionary out of
sync.
I thought about this for a while and concluded that the correct
solution would be to use libpspp/tower.c to maintain the case indices
for dictionary.c Then dict_compact becomes obsolete. I just wasn't
sure if it was worth the effort. What do you think ?
J'
--
PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3
fingerprint = 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285 A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3
See http://pgp.mit.edu or any PGP keyserver for public key.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ pspp-dev mailing list pspp-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-dev
