Follow-up Comment #17, patch #6650 (project pspp):
I looked over the patch briefly.
is_missing would be better as a bool? Likewise match_nodes could return
bool
Couldn't the listwise missing case be dealt with simply by inserting a
casefilter?
+enum {LISTWISE,
+ PAIRWISE};
I thought we already had a header file defining these, but it seems not.
Perhaps we should, since this is a issue which is pandemic to pspp.
In fit_model, there is still an instance of a literal MV_ANY. Is that
correct?
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/patch/?6650>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
_______________________________________________
pspp-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-dev
