Am Mittwoch, den 14.03.2012, 11:41 +0000 schrieb John Darrington: > On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 10:51:15AM +0100, bojo42 wrote: > Sorry guys, it just won't stop ;) > > No problem. That's what software development is all about. > > Now that we finally have all architectures passed the testsuite in > Debian i just wanted to push some backports and imports in my PPA for > Ubuntu. > > While this was successful for 10.04 (and i therefore could responded to > the "PSPP-BUG: Request for help..." mail) it gives me testsuite errors > for 12.04 on i386 that i again cannot reproduce locally. > > The failed suites are: 180 181 438 > > Please see: > > https://launchpadlibrarian.net/96702497/buildlog_ubuntu-precise-i386.pspp_0.7.9%2Bgit20120311-1~bojo1~precise1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz > > If you can't get a clue out of that i would just try a stupid rebuild. > > I don't think a blind rebuild will help.
Yes for sure ;) > 438 is one of those precision issues probably due to a different compiler or > math library. > In fact, the comment in the test shows that we've had similar problems before: > > dnl Some machines return .313 instead of .312 for the Point Probability > dnl (see bug #31611). > AT_CHECK([sed 's/\.313$/.312/' pspp.csv], [0], [dnl > > I think we should just relax the test a bit in a similar fashion. I have to correct myself, since i can reproduce 438 now locally with pbuilder but not 180 and 181. > > 180 and 181 both relate to reading of openoffice.org spreadsheet files and > seem > to be just warnings. I wonder why the problem didn't show up on debian? > Maybe a > different libxml library? Since this xml is generated by openoffice itself, > there's > probably not much we can do if libxml thinks it is wrong. Perhaps we should > just > change the test to ignore the warning. > However if someone who uses Ubuntu can run the tests manually and get a > confirmation of > the problem it would be better. > > Does Ubuntu have newer or older libraries than Debian Sid ? They should nearly be the same. Unfortunatly i don't have much time till the week end or the start of next week. But i will take a deeper look then and report back. > > J' > > _______________________________________________ pspp-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-dev
