I pushed a fix for this.
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 09:28:04PM +0100, bojo42 wrote:
I let it rebuild for precise with current Git and while the 180 & 181
are fixed just fine, there still is an error with the 439 test:
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/97273119/buildlog_ubuntu-precise-i386.pspp_0.7.9%2Bgit20120318-0ubuntu1~bojo1~precise1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz
Am Mittwoch, den 14.03.2012, 22:15 -0700 schrieb Ben Pfaff:
> Ben Pfaff <[email protected]> writes:
>
> > John Darrington <[email protected]> writes:
> >
> >> 180 and 181 both relate to reading of openoffice.org
> >> spreadsheet files and seem to be just warnings. I wonder why
> >> the problem didn't show up on debian? Maybe a different libxml
> >> library? Since this xml is generated by openoffice itself,
> >> there's probably not much we can do if libxml thinks it is
> >> wrong. Perhaps we should just change the test to ignore the
> >> warning.
> >
> > Looking through my own builder's logs, I see at least three
> > failures of these tests on different days (Feb. 29 and March 2
> > and 3):
> >
> > http://pspp.benpfaff.org/~blp/pspp-master/20120229030501/testsuite.dir/
> > http://pspp.benpfaff.org/~blp/pspp-master/20120302030501/testsuite.dir/
> > http://pspp.benpfaff.org/~blp/pspp-master/20120303030503/testsuite.dir/
> >
> > Must be something nondeterministic at work.
>
> I found it with valgrind and fixed it with this commit:-- PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3 fingerprint = 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285 A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3 See http://keys.gnupg.net or any PGP keyserver for public key.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ pspp-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-dev
