On 10/11/20, Daniele Varrazzo (daniele.varra...@gmail.com) wrote: > Anyone against using "psycopg" as package name, and starting from 3 as > version number?
Personally I think the "3" in "psycopg3" is clearer than simply "psycopg" in relation to this being an evolution of the psycopg2 package. Rory
