On 11/10/20 9:24 AM, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
On 10/11/20, Daniele Varrazzo (daniele.varra...@gmail.com) wrote:
Anyone against using "psycopg" as package name, and starting from 3 as
version number?

Personally I think the "3" in "psycopg3" is clearer than simply
"psycopg" in relation to this being an evolution of the psycopg2
package.

And for me, a lone 3 at the end of a package name means Python 3 version.

Maybe skip the 3 and go straight to 4?

--
~Ethan~


Reply via email to