Hi Salu:
Believe me, I understand your position fully.  I have had a similar 
relationship with Cakewalk for around 15 years now.  Through meetings in person 
at their office in Boston, as well as a lot of work on the beta team, I feel 
I’ve been able to accomplish quite a bit.  Mike Mandel has also attended these 
meetings.  I think companies like this like to deal with as few folks as 
possible with matters like this, and you are the obvious person for working 
with avid and pro tools.  I personally would not have a problem contributing 
financially to your efforts.  It is much more expensive to fly to LA and stay 
out there than it is for me to take a one day junket to Boston.  And, there has 
been a significant period of time where Cakewalk has really not been able to 
devote any real time to accessibility issues when they decided to go in a new 
direction with their Sonar X products.  Even companies like Reaper, who started 
with all good intentions, have not been able to solve some issues, and the 
person who has written the access module is Russian and very hard to get in 
touch with.  I sincerely was hoping that Apple would come through with logic.   

Gord

From: Chris Norman 
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 11:38 AM
To: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: some more details about the meeting and your support

Well, let me start out by saying that I for one am extremely greatful for what 
you've managed to achieve so far. As I've previously stated, I don't know much 
really, other than what me and my guitar can do, and even then, I'm making it 
up 90% of the time! So, I am personally 100% behind you. 

I suspected there was some kind of secrecy surrounding what you and Avid were 
doing, and although personally I believe that almost all information should be 
freely available etc, there's obviously things that you can't discuss


Take care,
Chris Norman
<[email protected]>




On 14 Nov 2012, at 16:27, Slau Halatyn wrote:


  Members of this list,

  I'm writing an open letter to all of you with my concerns and a request. I've 
been working on the issue of Pro Tools accessibility for a very long time. I 
wasn't involved with the initial progress back in OS 9 but I did become deeply 
involved under OS X. I never campaigned for this "position," for lack of a 
better word but I took on the role, firstly, for personal reasons, having 
wanted to have an accessible platform as an audio engineer and, secondly, for 
the sake of many blind musicians who needed a unified voice representing the 
immediate concerns for an accessible Pro Tools platform. I've spent enormous 
sums of money and countless hours on this project. I never asked for a dime, 
mostly because of my personal interest in the outcome but also because I never 
wanted to feel like I was beholden to anybody in any way. There were times, 
sometimes huge swaths of time, that often passed with no visible results but I 
knew it was time well spent because of the quality of the relationships I've 
built and the results we've gotten so far.

  I now know what it probably feels like to be a politician. Let me assure you 
that it's no stroll in the park. Sometimes, you are not at liberty to discuss 
certain details openly for any number of reasons. I have a new appreciation for 
executive privilege and classified information. That said, I've been as open as 
I could possibly be with both the list and the periodic updates on the petition 
site. I also have a new appreciation for how one cannot satisfy the desires of 
everyone. I can also appreciate that old saying about walking a mile in 
someone's shoes.

  Although, as I've said, I've never campaigned for this, I've also fallen into 
this situation by default. I never asked for this and I only agreed to it, at 
least in my mind, because I honestly felt responsible and I also felt that I 
was the right person for the job.

  Every so often, it seems, I find the need to defend myself against what I 
essentially find to be restlessness on the part of some people. I don't take it 
personally because I understand that it comes from a frustration with the 
status quo or, more accurately, a perceived lack of progress. I, too, feel 
frustrated some of the time and I share many of the concerns of others on this 
list. I agree with many ideas and I categorically disagree with other ideas or 
at least their implementation and timing. I realize that, when I happen to 
disagree with an approach, I probably lose the confidence of those who see 
things differently. That's OK. As I said earlier, I accept the fact that I 
can't satisfy everybody's wishes—it's impossible. What I do feel that I have is 
the support of the majority of our community and I do appreciate that.

  As I stated earlier, I feel like a politician and I don't particularly enjoy 
it. My commitment to the issue of Pro Tools accessibility and to this community 
are as follows:

  I will continue my relationship with several key individuals at Avid in the 
interest of ensuring a future for Pro Tools accessibility. There are a couple 
of things we're waiting for at the moment that will determine how I feel we 
should proceed. Pending that initial outcome, I will make a personal decision 
whether to continue the work I've been doing. Even if the outcome is favorable, 
I'm not sure that I'll take on any responsibility other than beta testing, as 
I've done on and off over the years. If the outcome is less favorable, I'll 
offer my suggestions for a path toward a goal but I won't take on any 
responsibilities unless an explicit majority of this community give me mandate 
to move forward with a plan. To put a timeframe on it, essentially, I'll 
probably have some feeling for which way this will likely go in a few days, 
maybe a week.

  In a separate email, I will discuss some more details of my meeting at Avid. 
Please be aware that I won't engage in a debate on the merits of any given 
approach. I'm tired of defending and explaining things. Politicians usually 
have a staff to handle such things. Please don't occupy my bandwidth with a 
whole bunch of suggestions that will require loads of my time to respond to. 
This is a public forum and everybody's entitled to express themselves but, just 
as I am required not to take things personally, don't take it personally if I 
don't engage in a debate about the merits of a particular approach. I believe 
what I'm doing is right and that, every step of the way, I've made good choices.

  I have a short session in about a half hour so the email about the meeting 
will follow in the afternoon.

  Thanks,

  Slau


Reply via email to