I guess when you say the track commit feature, I've never heard of that, or at 
least if I have, never in that termanology.  Can you try explaining that 
process?

Maybe what I'm doing isn't the right way of bouncing to start with.  Basically, 
I'm simply just making sure no tracks are armed, then am hitting 
command+Option+B and just bouncing the whole session to an interleaved 16 bit 
48K wave file all in one shebang.

Chris.

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Slau Halatyn 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 2:26 PM
  Subject: Re: Has anyone observed this with Ivory?


  Hi Chris,


  As Brian mentioned, Ivory is intensive on CPU processing. The plug-in is 
streaming potentially many dozens of large audio files at any given second not 
to mention any further internal processing like resonance, ambience, etc. 
Unlike algorithms that process very efficiently, real-time streaming of 
multiple audio threads is a CPU challenge. It's a bit of a trade-off in terms 
of speed but offline bouncing is still generally faster depending on the 
complexity of the rest of the session. I don't find it to be particularly slow. 
I use an external Thunderbolt drive chassis with an SSD dedicated to Ivory. 
While I do notice that bouncing an instrument track with Ivory does take longer 
than pure audio tracks, it's only noticeably longer but surely not practically 
as long as a real-time bounce. Again, the track commit feature is a good 
approach for quicker bounces once the instrument part has been finalized. Even 
if it's not absolutely complete, one can always reactivate the instrument 
track, make changes and recommit.


  HTH,


  Slau


  On Nov 26, 2015, at 1:41 PM, Christopher-Mark Gilland <[email protected]> 
wrote:


    OK, so almost the entire duration of the song in realtime. 
    Maybe there is something here I am forgetting to understand here, but why 
is it that Ivory in general slows things down so much.  Slau, I know you made 
mention it would be slower, but I'm not exactly understanding the reasonning.  
Sorry.  I kind a feel like an idiot for asking.

    Chris.



    -- 
    You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
    To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to [email protected].
    For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.




  -- 
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
  To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to [email protected].
  For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to