On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 01:59:21PM -0700, Archie Cobbs wrote: > Jason Evans wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 08:29:53PM +0200, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: > > > In case there are still any problems and/or patches around > > > we still have not included into the CVS state of Pth (see > > > http://cvs.ossp.org/pkg/lib/pth/), please do not hesitate to repost them > > > here again. Perhaps they were just lost or overlooked. I'll try to > > > make sure they are considered again. > > > > Following is a patch that I posted, and it has not been committed. As > > noted in its explanation, it may not suite the needs of the maintainers, > > but if you provide some feedback, I'm perfectly willing to do the work to > > make it acceptable. > > Hello Ralf and the list, > > I would like to kindly point out that there has been no response > whatsoever (that I've seen) to Jason's email sent back on June 30, > nor have the changes been incorporated into pth (according to the > http://cvs.ossp.org/pkg/lib/pth/). > > This is somewhat ironic, given this particular thread...
I also sent email directly to Ralf, and heard no response from that either. As things stand, I can't help but form the grudging opionion that pth is being squatted on. Pretending to maintain a project without actually doing so is worse than doing nothing at all, since it discourages others from filling the void. Jason ______________________________________________________________________ GNU Portable Threads (Pth) http://www.gnu.org/software/pth/ User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager (Majordomo) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
