Hackers, I understand that domain polymorphism has advantages of a plug-n-play environment in terms of the receivers being automatically retrieved from the domain specific directors allowing the actors to retain their behavior in different domains.
1. However, most of the time the modeler knows what MoC is being employed to model a certain component and I believe it is rare that someone would change their mind that requires changing the domain director during modeling. 2. From the documents the hierarchy describing the polymorphism is incomplete and it seems like many actors are not domain polymorphic with many other domains. So, though this feature is very handy for the GUI visualization and a very neat concept, what are the true uses of such domain polymorphism? 3. Are transparent composite actors a result of requiring structural hierarchy and to facilitate the GUI for large models? Thank you for your assistance, -- ~ Hiren <hiren at vt dot edu> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Posted to the ptolemy-hackers mailing list. Please send administrative mail for this list to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
