Hi, 2012/3/23 Michael Olbrich <[email protected]>: > Hi, > > I've seen the whole series, but I'm rather busy, and this requires a bit > more thinking. So it may take a while before we get everything in. > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:14:44PM +0100, Remy Bohmer wrote: >> The ARCH_X86_64 architecture is added as subtype of ARCH_X86 since it >> basically is the same architecture, and a mix of both architectures >> will be required to allow multilib support in a later commit. >> >> Signed-off-by: Remy Bohmer <[email protected]> >> --- >> v2: no changes since v1 >> >> platforms/architecture.in | 15 +++++++++++++-- >> 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/platforms/architecture.in b/platforms/architecture.in >> index ed36e8a..f00108e 100644 >> --- a/platforms/architecture.in >> +++ b/platforms/architecture.in >> @@ -181,6 +181,16 @@ choice >> >> endchoice >> >> +if ARCH_X86 >> +# >> +# 32/64 bits platform >> +# >> +config ARCH_X86_64 >> + bool "64 bit architecture" >> + help >> + Select this option if you build for a 64 bit architecture. >> + >> +endif > > Have you considered adding ARCH_X86_32 as well (in a switch)? I think some > if our current "ifdef ARCH_X86" are really for 32bit only, so an option > would probably be useful.
I considered that but thought to look it like this: Assume the platform is 32 bit, unless specified otherwise. But maybe I have to look it at it more carefully. I drop it from the series, and will repost this patch later. First, finalize the rest of the series first. Kind regards, Remy -- ptxdist mailing list [email protected]
