On Sonntag, 10. September 2017 21:16:52 CEST Robert Schwebel wrote: > On Sat, Sep 09, 2017 at 08:36:13PM +0200, Tim Sander wrote: > > I really would like to use ptxdist for my next private project where i > > would like to try ROS. > > ROS1 or ROS2? I would like to have something not to dated. The website lists Lunar or Kinetic Kame as versions...
> > As far as i see, its already packaged for OpenEmbedded or Angstrom. > > I only know of old ROS packages made by the BMW folks, but this is > neither current versions of ROS, nor ROS2. Do you know of newer code? This seems to be the repository for kinetic kame: https://github.com/bulwahn/meta-ros/tree/kinetic-experimental > > But as it has its own build tools and lots of python module > > dependencies it might be to much to get all this stuff build with > > ptxdist. > > We started with ptxdist packaging for ROS2 two techweeks ago, but it is > a slow process if you have only one week per year. If someone would be > interested commercially, it would probably be possible to get a solution > faster, bug that didn't happen so far. Well its my private tinkering project... Do you have something i can build upon. I think one hurdle would be the custom build system? > > As for the speed i would say that one of my biggest gripes with ptxdist is > > that -je16 -ji16 builds fail for me. And with that many virtual cores > > available its realy a pitty :-(. > > Do you have logfiles for the fails? We are doing a lot of test builds > here, and if something breaks, we would like to know. Strange, i think if i just do a build of DistroKit i can observe that make just stops. I can restart it so a for i in `seq 1 10`; do ptxdist -je16 -ji16 go; done; Works faster than a normal build, so the failure is that not all packages are getting build? Best regards Tim _______________________________________________ ptxdist mailing list [email protected]
