Hello Alexander, On 2/5/19 8:30 AM, Alexander Dahl wrote: > Hei hei, > > I had another look at this series, because I'm currently building u-boot for > a > new target. This patch looks good I think (see below). > > However, what is the status of this whole series? Will there be a v2?
No v2 planned, because I don't need this anymore.. Feel free to adopt the patches you need and formulate a v2 however! > > Am Mittwoch, 10. Oktober 2018, 14:03:36 CET schrieb Ahmad Fatoum: >> Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fat...@pengutronix.de> >> --- >> platforms/u-boot.in | 14 ++++++++++++++ >> rules/u-boot.make | 13 +++++++++++-- >> 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/platforms/u-boot.in b/platforms/u-boot.in >> index 38684a03a376..bcb78cfc3f5a 100644 >> --- a/platforms/u-boot.in >> +++ b/platforms/u-boot.in >> @@ -75,5 +75,19 @@ config U_BOOT_INSTALL_U_BOOT_IMX >> Installing the U-Boot image with imx header (u-boot.imx) into platform >> image directory. Say yes if you are building for freescale i.MX SOC >> >> +config U_BOOT_INSTALL_U_BOOT_DTB >> + prompt "install u-boot-dtb.bin" >> + bool >> + help >> + Installing the U-Boot binary concatenated with the device tree >> + into platform image directory. >> + >> +config U_BOOT_INSTALL_U_BOOT_WITH_SPL_PBL >> + prompt "install u-boot-with-spl-pbl.bin" >> + bool >> + help >> + Installing the U-Boot binary which contains as well the SPL and PBL. >> + Say yes if you are building for Layerscape SoCs >> + >> endif >> >> diff --git a/rules/u-boot.make b/rules/u-boot.make >> index 24f3fe3983f5..d9bcdf5ca64d 100644 >> --- a/rules/u-boot.make >> +++ b/rules/u-boot.make >> @@ -93,6 +93,14 @@ ifdef PTXCONF_U_BOOT_INSTALL_U_BOOT_IMG >> endif >> ifdef PTXCONF_U_BOOT_INSTALL_U_BOOT_IMX >> @install -v -D -m644 $(U_BOOT_DIR)/u-boot.imx $(IMAGEDIR)/u-boot.imx >> +endif >> +ifdef PTXCONF_U_BOOT_INSTALL_U_BOOT_DTB >> + @install -v -D -m644 $(U_BOOT_DIR)/u-boot-dtb.bin \ >> + $(IMAGEDIR)/u-boot-dtb.bin >> +endif >> +ifdef PTXCONF_U_BOOT_INSTALL_U_BOOT_WITH_SPL_PBL >> + @install -v -D -m644 $(U_BOOT_DIR)/u-boot-with-spl-pbl.bin \ >> + $(IMAGEDIR)/u-boot-with-spl-pbl.bin >> endif >> @$(call touch) >> >> @@ -103,8 +111,9 @@ endif >> $(STATEDIR)/u-boot.clean: >> @$(call targetinfo) >> @$(call clean_pkg, U_BOOT) >> - @rm -vf $(IMAGEDIR)/u-boot.bin $(IMAGEDIR)/u-boot.srec >> $(IMAGEDIR)/u-boot.elf - @rm -vf $(IMAGEDIR)/u-boot.imx >> + @rm -vf $(IMAGEDIR)/u-boot.bin $(IMAGEDIR)/u-boot.srec >> + @rm -vf $(IMAGEDIR)/u-boot.elf $(IMAGEDIR)/u-boot.imx >> + @rm -vf $(IMAGEDIR)/u-boot-dtb.bin $(IMAGEDIR)/u-boot-with-spl-pbl.bin >> >> # >> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> - # oldconfig / menuconfig > > The "u-boot-dtb.bin" and clean parts look fine. > > However, in upstream u-boot 2019.01 I could not find a defconfig which > actually creates a file "u-boot-with-spl-pbl.bin" although there seems to be > a > make target for that. Could you name a defconfig for testing? ls1046ardb_emmc_defconfig > > Greets > Alex > > Cheers Ahmad -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ ptxdist mailing list ptxdist@pengutronix.de
