On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 10:10:01AM -0500, Jon Ringle wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 9:42 AM Michael Olbrich <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 09:09:18AM -0500, Jon Ringle wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 8:22 AM Ian Abbott <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 20/02/2019 13:17, Ian Abbott wrote:
> > > > > On 20/02/2019 00:59, Jon Ringle wrote:
> > > > >> I've got a strange permission problem when I build on our build
> > server
> > > > >> that was recently updated from Ubuntu-14.04 to Ubuntu-16.04.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On our Ubuntu-16.04 server, on most of the platform/packages/
> > > > >> subdirectories the packages are getting created with other having no
> > > > >> permissions at all:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> rootfs/platform-ec1c/packages$ tree -d -L 1 -p
> > > > >> .
> > > > >> ├── [drwxr-x---]  attr-2.4.47
> > > > >> ├── [drwxr-x---]  avahi-0.7
> > > > >> ├── [drwxr-x---]  bash-4.3.30
> > > > >> ├── [drwxr-x---]  boost_1_67_0
> > > > >> ├── [drwxr-x---]  busybox-1.29.3
> > > > >> ├── [drwxr-x---]  coreutils-8.29
> > > > >> ...
> > > > >>
> > > > >> This results in all files contained within those directories to also
> > > > >> have no perms for other, and get installed on my target in the same
> > > > >> way. This in turn then causes permission problems to occur.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I'm at a loss as to what to look for to resolve this problem.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Suggestions?
> > > > >
> > > > > I think you are building with umask 0027, so files are created with
> > no
> > > > > permissions for 'other' users.  This should not affect the contents
> > of
> > > > > the platform-ec1c/packages/*.ipk files, or the contents of the
> > > > > platform-ec1c/root/ directory, or the contents of the
> > > > > platform-ec1c/images/root.* images, which should all contain files
> > with
> > > > > the correct permissions for the target.
> > > >
> > > > Correction: The platform-ec1c/root/ directory contents do not have the
> > > > correct ownership for the target, but the file mode bits should be
> > correct.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > I also thought that perhaps it was a umask issue, but as you can see
> > below,
> > > umask is 0022, which should be ok.
> > > The permission problem that I am having on the target is that
> > > systemd-networkd.service won't start because it can't read the
> > > configuration files below. These files are installed in systemd.make via:
> > >
> > > ifdef PTXCONF_SYSTEMD_NETWORK
> > >         @$(call install_tree, systemd, 0, 0, -, /usr/lib/systemd/network)
> > >         @$(call install_alternative_tree, systemd, 0, 0,
> > > /usr/lib/systemd/network)

Another idea: This is in ptxdist or your BSP. What are the files
permissions there?

> > > endif
> > >         @$(call install_alternative, systemd, 0, 0, 0644, \
> > >                 /usr/lib/systemd/network/99-default.link)
> >
> > Right, install_alternative_tree picks the source file permissions. The
> > question is, why are those incorrect?
> >
> > I've come across some issues with fakeroot and permissions elsewhere. Can
> > you run the attached script with the fakeroot from sysroot-host/ and send
> > the results?
V> >
> >
> jringle@dev-atl-bamb01:/srv/gpec-build/rootfs/platform-ec1c/sysroot-host/bin$
> ./fakeroot ~/fake-test
> fakeroot: preload library `libfakeroot.so' not found, aborting.
> jringle@dev-atl-bamb01:/srv/gpec-build/rootfs/platform-ec1c/sysroot-host/bin$
> cd ../../..
> jringle@dev-atl-bamb01:/srv/gpec-build/rootfs$ ptxdist bash
> [ptx] jringle@dev-atl-bamb01:/srv/gpec-build/rootfs$ which fakeroot
> /srv/gpec-build/rootfs/platform-ec1k/sysroot-host/bin/fakeroot
> [ptx] jringle@dev-atl-bamb01:/srv/gpec-build/rootfs$ fakeroot ~/fake-test
[...]

This looks all ok.

Michael

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

_______________________________________________
ptxdist mailing list
[email protected]

Reply via email to