On 5 Oct 2010, at 11:30, Sam Ruby wrote: > On 10/05/2010 04:51 AM, Bijan Parsia wrote: >>> On 10/04/2010 09:51 AM, Shelley Powers wrote: >>>> >>>> By submitting Last Call comments here in this email list, as part >>>> of the broader W3C Last Call process, I can participate, fully, >>>> throughout the entire process. >>> >>> We will NOT use the [email protected] email as the target >>> for discussions related to any comments entered here. >> >> Sorry, I had a bit of trouble parsing that (or at least understanding >> the significance). >> >> My interpretation is that WG discussion of LC comments will happen in >> the normal WG fora (such as the WG mailing list). >> >> This is bog standard. > > "Bog standard"? People in the UK sure do talk funny. :-)
I talked that way in the US as well, American me :) > This mailing list is intended to be where the comments are made and where the > resposes are sent. > > The point that I was trying to make is that discussion of Last Call comments > will often occur on the public-html mailing list. And, as you point out, > surveys also tend to be open only to WG participants. Yep! Good. That's what I thought. [snip] >> A reasonable strategy is to raise the comment *now* as a bug. If the >> working group fails to dispose of it to your satisfaction, you can >> raise it as an LC comment. (i.e., "My comment is that I'm not >> satisfied with the WG resolution to my bug #237.") That may trigger >> another round of discussion, which may just be "We're not going to >> change this." > > I would go further and state that raising the comment as a bug is the > preferred strategy. Agreed. Cheers, Bijan.
