-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Undisclosed. Recipients <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Monday, 16 August 1999 2:24 PM Subject: The Chief Justice of New South Wales >This will be updated on our web page to night on latest letter. > >The Chief Justice of New South Wales >J J Spigelman >Supreme Court of New South Wales >GPO Box 3 >SYDNEY 2001 > >Dear Sir/Madam, copy: Simpson. >I write in support of John and Laraine Wilson Re: File No: 11203 of 1999, >St. George bank Limited -v John and Laraine Wilson. > I have enclosed a single copy of each of my published works on the banking >and monetary system and suggest a perusal of the information available on >the Internet at www.bankfreedom.com may be of interest to you. > From the outset I must say that I am not in the least bit surprised that >John and Laraine are having such difficulty with the judicial system. We >have known the banking system has been corrupt for hundreds of years. We >have come to realise recently that the judicial system is also corrupt and >that the average person has no hope of obtaining justice in an Australian >court. I have heard, and my clients have reported to me, of magistrates and >judges, when denying rights to defendants to speak on certain matters, >saying "This is my court and I make the law here." Had I not heard it with >my own ears I would have not believed such disgusting tales, however, the >rottenness of our system is now so entrenched that these arrogant creatures >do believe they do make the law. With the corruption in the police forces, >brought about by the assumed power wielded by persons unsuited to their >positions, to the corruption coupled with the court system, is it any wonder >these high-handed creatures assume their arrogance. How much does it take to >buy a magistrate or judge today? It cannot be much as the low-life police >officers have been doing it for years working hand-in-glove with low-life >judicial officers. As the saying goes, "Power corrupts, and absolute power >corrupts absolutely". Our parliaments are riddled with liars making laws to >suit themselves. It surely can be no coincidence that more and more lawyers >are being selected by political parties to further their selfish aims. As >Richardson said, in admitting that politicians are liars, "Whatever it >takes." > With respect to the High Court of Australia, we now have a mediator (I >could not defame the title "Justice" by giving it to this creature) who is a >self-confessed sodomite. How can a person possibly sit in judgement on >anything if he does not know the difference between the playground and the >sewer. He has been afraid all his life until recently, to admit to being a >dung pusher because he knows it is not normal or natural. This same creature >has held considerable sway over so-called human rights issues in Australia >for a considerable period of time. You had a twisted, criminal creature >sitting in the courts of New South Wales for a very long time and thank God >he did the decent thing and committed suicide so honest Australians would >not have to pay taxes to keep the bastard in jail. I only wish he had had >the courage to remain alive long enough for all the evidence to be brought >out into the open to show the people of Australia what kind of filth infests >our offices of "authority". But, what could we expect from a creature that >hid behind the facade of respectability after molesting children. The only >problem would have been that he would have been protected by his scumbag >colleagues and political "mates". > As Lord Acton predicted, "The issue that has swept down the centuries, and >must be fought sooner or later, is, the people versus the banks." The time >has come, although I believe it to be the banks versus the people, as the >people are becoming more and more aware of the corruption, the bankers are >now having to defend themselves. Is it any wonder that the people of >Australia now see themselves as gearing up for a civil war? I fear that it >is coming to that as the "haves" take more and the "havenots" get less and >less. > My greatest disgust is reserved for the judiciary. A court is supposed to >dispense justice without fear or favour. However, I believe that many in the >judiciary would not know justice if it fell on their heads. With regard to >the banking industry, it is abundantly clear that all the judiciary are on >side with the banks. Is this because they fear the banks and therefore the >favour to them is born of fear of them? Quite frankly it demonstrates how >low supposedly decent human beings will stoop to protect their jobs and >pensions. All the poverty, homelessness, despair, family breakdown, domestic >violence and other social problems can be sheeted home to the introduction >of money into the community by way of interest bearing debt. All money is >created, and loaned into the community, by the private banks and therefore >they bear the responsibility for the end problems. If you do not know how >the system works then you are not fit to hold the position of Chief >"Justice". If you do know, then you are corrupt and again not fit to hold >your position. I would be quite prepared to wager that you do know how the >rotten banking and monetary system works and are therefore corrupt. Nothing >surprises me these days. After reading my books you will know. What changes >will you make in dealing with the bankster bastards? I doubt you would have >the balls to make the right decision. It is clear that "Justice" Simpson has >no balls. > Recently a colleague of mine, when presenting argument, was told by the >"judge" who suggested the argument was weak, "I think, if I may use a >football example, that you are kicking against the wind." "Ah yes", my >colleague replied "But let us not forget that at half time we change ends." >With respect to the issue of the thieving bankster bastards I believe it is >past half time and we have been kicking with the wind for some time. It is >clear that the people will win as the truth always surfaces. > The old story that refers to the cream of society also has taken a new >twist. We now know that as pollution takes a hold that it is the scum that >rises to the surface, cream, as of course we know, is thick and full of >clots. > If Simpson does not have the intestinal fortitude to admit to understanding >that a contract with a bank cannot be valid if it contains a variable >interest rate (variable by only the bank, by one party to an agreement) then >I suppose that will be just another name added to the list of people to be >investigated. I look forward to the day, which I believe is fast coming upon >us, when the people of Australia will have the capacity to remove >politicians and public servants who do not perform their responsibilities >fairly and justly. > I hope against hope that you are a decent and honourable person, capable of >ensuring that justice is served and that the people of New South Wales come >before the interests of the thieving banksters. >Thank you for your time. >Have a nice day. > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- This is the Neither public email list, open for the public and general discussion. To unsubscribe click here Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=unsubscribe To subscribe click here Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=subscribe For information on [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.neither.org/lists/public-list.htm For archives http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
