Dear Fellow Australians,
The NSW Crimes Act 1900, Section 300 (2) says: A person who uses an
instrument which is, and which the person knows to be, false, with the
intention of inducing another person: (a) to accept the instrument as
genuine: and (b) because of that acceptance, to do or not do some act to
that other person's, or to another person's, prejudice, is liable to
penal servitude for 10 years.
Appearing on pages 30 and 31 of The SunHerald, October 3, 1999 is an
advertisement "Authorised by the Commonwealth Government, Capital Hill,
Canberra. Written by D. Williams and C. Ellison, Capital Hill,
Canberra.". This same advertisement is being published ib many other
newspapers around Australia.
Section 299 (1) of that Crimes Act says: In this Chapter: "instrument"
means: (a) any document, whether of a formal or informal character;....
The Commonwealth Government (in particular D. Williams and C. Ellison) are
making out that the Australian Constitution to be a valid document whereas,
in fact, it was invalidated on 10/1/1920 when Australia relinquished its
status as a British Colony upon signing the Covenant of the League of
Nations (ie Articles 1 - 30 of the Treaty of Versailles) as a sovereign and
independent nation which meant that all laws of a foreign power (which
included the UK Parliament's Act to Constitute the Commonwealth of
Australia) were made null and void.
The Supreme Court Act 1970, Section 23 says: Jurisdiction generally. The
Court shall have all jurisdiction which may be necessary for the
Administration of justice in New South Wales.
In order to stop the Referendum planned for 8 November, there would have
to become a Plaintiff and file a Statement of Claim in the Supreme Court
claiming that either the Commonwealth Government or D. Williams and C.
Ellison to be the Defendants, accompanied by a Notice of Motion for a
Prohibitive Injuction to stop the Referendum being held "until the case is
fully heard".
Naturaly, with the judges we have, the Statement of Claim would be
dismissed and one would have to appeal through the Court of Appeal to the
High Court and then on to the United Nation's Commisioner for Human Rights
in Geneva. All the time the same conditions apply, ie: the Referendum
cannot be allowed "until the case is fully heard".
Because we have no Constitution, we have an opportunity to create the best
and fairest democracy in the history of the world. We can truly have a
"government of the people, for the people and by the people" without
political parties and other vested interests subverting Right and Justice.
This present lot of politicians and judges don't want to people to know
that they are illegitimate because the founding document (ie: instrument)
which established their Ivory Towers is false.
Proposed constitutions such as "Alternative Three" with Joe Bryant as the
mover and pusher are well worth examining.
Let's reclaim our rights inherited from English Common Law and build a
system of government which will be the envy of the world.
Yours sincerely,
John Wilso.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is the Neither public email list, open for the public and general discussion.
To unsubscribe click here Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=unsubscribe
To subscribe click here Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=subscribe
For information on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.neither.org/lists/public-list.htm
For archives
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
