----- Original Message ----- From: John Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: John Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, 4 October 1999 1:38 PM Subject: The Australian Constitution is a False Instrument. > Dear Fellow Australians, > > The NSW Crimes Act 1900, Section 300 (2) says: A person who uses an > instrument which is, and which the person knows to be, false, with the > intention of inducing another person: (a) to accept the instrument as > genuine: and (b) because of that acceptance, to do or not do some act to > that other person's, or to another person's, prejudice, is liable to > penal servitude for 10 years. > > Appearing on pages 30 and 31 of The SunHerald, October 3, 1999 is an > advertisement "Authorised by the Commonwealth Government, Capital Hill, > Canberra. Written by D. Williams and C. Ellison, Capital Hill, > Canberra.". This same advertisement is being published ib many other > newspapers around Australia. > > Section 299 (1) of that Crimes Act says: In this Chapter: "instrument" > means: (a) any document, whether of a formal or informal character;.... > > The Commonwealth Government (in particular D. Williams and C. Ellison) are > making out that the Australian Constitution to be a valid document whereas, > in fact, it was invalidated on 10/1/1920 when Australia relinquished its > status as a British Colony upon signing the Covenant of the League of > Nations (ie Articles 1 - 30 of the Treaty of Versailles) as a sovereign and > independent nation which meant that all laws of a foreign power (which > included the UK Parliament's Act to Constitute the Commonwealth of > Australia) were made null and void. > > The Supreme Court Act 1970, Section 23 says: Jurisdiction generally. The > Court shall have all jurisdiction which may be necessary for the > Administration of justice in New South Wales. > > In order to stop the Referendum planned for 8 November, there would have > to become a Plaintiff and file a Statement of Claim in the Supreme Court > claiming that either the Commonwealth Government or D. Williams and C. > Ellison to be the Defendants, accompanied by a Notice of Motion for a > Prohibitive Injuction to stop the Referendum being held "until the case is > fully heard". > > Naturaly, with the judges we have, the Statement of Claim would be > dismissed and one would have to appeal through the Court of Appeal to the > High Court and then on to the United Nation's Commisioner for Human Rights > in Geneva. All the time the same conditions apply, ie: the Referendum > cannot be allowed "until the case is fully heard". > > Because we have no Constitution, we have an opportunity to create the best > and fairest democracy in the history of the world. We can truly have a > "government of the people, for the people and by the people" without > political parties and other vested interests subverting Right and Justice. > > This present lot of politicians and judges don't want to people to know > that they are illegitimate because the founding document (ie: instrument) > which established their Ivory Towers is false. > > Proposed constitutions such as "Alternative Three" with Joe Bryant as the > mover and pusher are well worth examining. > > Let's reclaim our rights inherited from English Common Law and build a > system of government which will be the envy of the world. > > Yours sincerely, > > John Wilso. > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > This is the Neither public email list, open for the public and general discussion. > > To unsubscribe click here Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=unsubscribe > To subscribe click here Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=subscribe > > For information on [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.neither.org/lists/public-list.htm > For archives > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
