To: Ian Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi Ian,
Attached are four associated articles on the Constitution which might provide some
answers
to your questions.
I don't know how thoroughly you have researched the causes of the present political,
economic, and environmental problems worldwide. Anybody I know who has thoroughly
done so
has reached the conclusion that the major problems in the world today can all be laid
at
the door of an identifiable group of moneylender world controllers who have been using
the
same techniques and pursuing a goal of world domination, for at least the last three
thousand years. They use grand fraud with money creation out of thin air, to finance
their subversive operations. The government of every nation on earth has become an
accomplice to this counterfeiting racket, which certainly amounts to Treason under
British
Common Law. Leaked documents indicate that they seek to establish their tyrannous
single
world government very soon, and quite possibly within weeks or months. The
Constitution
for this Single World Government has been circulating worldwide for about ten years.
Historical records clearly show that the same political moneylending cabal were using
the
same techniques in ancient Rome as they are using today, and with the same disastrous
effects for the people of that nation. Similar tactics were used before that in
Babylon,
Persia and Greece. Individual nations have gotten fed up with them and tossed them
out,
time after time, but they keep on turning up again like a bad smell. Their own unique
brand of sacred law makes them inevitable treacherous enemies of every person not
belonging to their cabal. Even "lesser" members of their own group are considered to
be
quite expendable cannon fodder in their quest for World domination.
If we are to hope to defeat the moneylender World Controller cabal who have already
had
iron clad de facto control of the entire world for at least the last two centuries, the
only effective weapon available to us that I know of is a strict legalistic
interpretation
of the Australian Constitution. The fact that the Australian Constitution is a
legally
binding contract with massive punitive damages specified for breaches of that contract
is
of vital importance. It provides a means of destroying the power base of the World
Controllers and it provides a means of doing that worldwide. The fact that no lawful
Australian Federal or State Parliament has sat in the 100 years since 1900 greatly
strengthens the power of that Constitutional law.
It is to some extent only an incidental matter that a strict legalistic interpretation
of
the Australian Constitution wipes out all Acts of all Australian and State Parliaments
and
all referenda since 1900. This includes wiping out the unlawful existence of the High
Court and all other Federal or State Courts created since 1900. Since much of this
Parliament made law and much of the Court rulings were unconstitutional in any case, we
are well rid of it all. Anything that was worthwhile can always be preserved by a later
lawfully constituted Parliament.
There was plenty of unconstitutional, contract-defying and tyrannous law introduced by
British Parliament and British Courts before 1900, which should also be chucked out,
but
it seems best to start with the sound basis of established Australian Constitutional
law
dating to 1900 before attending to earlier law subverted by the agentur of the
moneylenders. (The true British Constitution was once regarded as a contract between
people and Monarch too, but without the penal clauses inserted in the Australian
Constitution.)
In practice, I believe that we can easily do without over seven thousand poorly thought
out statute laws for the Commonwealth, and probably a similar amount for each of the
States plus about five times the volume of bureaucrat created regulations that were not
even discussed in Parliament, not to mention the hundreds of secret and usually
unconstitutional treaties entered into with the moneylender created United Nations,(
without even the dubious consideration of Parliament).
Nobody can possibly understand and obey so much poorly worded, ever-changing and
mutually
contradictory verbal diarrhoea. Its only detectable purpose is to subvert the genuine
British Common Law and to enrich the lawyers, both of which are clearly stated aims of
the
World Controller cabal. If Law is to be obeyed, the average person must be able to
understand all of it that affects them. Multiplication of laws of increasing
complexity
has historically always led to Tyranny in every country where it has occurred.
With this background, perhaps the basic information given in the attached documents
will
take on greater significance.
Regards,
John Harris
Ian Green wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> I don't remember the associated 3 or 4 pages related to the Constitution, unless it
>is the Murphy letters, which I am already aware of, and which has been refuted, or at
>least defeated by the High Court. So you are welcome to send them to me.
>
> If we were to lose all Federal statute law and revert entirely to Common Law > (and
>presumably State statute law, if only that prior to 1901) what is the reason that
>the Common Law built up by the invading Normans, or of the pre-1901 Australian
>colonial laws, is any more legitimate than that which we are compelled to obey today?
>
> Thanks for letting me know about Brett Dawson's book. I will contact him to find out
>more about it.
>
> Regards,
> Ian Green
> http://ao.com.au
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Direct Democracy Forum
> http://ao.com.au/ddf/
> http://www.DirectDemocracyForum.com/
>
> "Every person a member of the legislature!"
>
> Mailing Lists:
> Please follow the instructions at http://ao.com.au/ddf/groups.htm
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, 29 March 2000 11:24 AM
> To: Ian Green
> Subject: Re: Australia Wide Demonstrations on GST
>
> <SNIP>
> Since you presumably received the GST circulars second hand, did you receive
> the
> associated three (four page) documents related to the Constitution. If not,
> and you are
> interested, I could send them to you. If yes, and you would like any of the
> other
> references I gave, I am quite happy to send them to you.
>
> I personally don't regard the loss of all Parliament made law and all High
> Court rulings
> over the last hundred years as being any great loss. Most of it was highly
> suspect and
> such as we didn't need, and there would still remain British Common Law
> going back
> thousands of years. Any of the Parliament made law that might have any
> usefulness could
> be sustained by Executive emergency powers until such time as it could be
> legitimised by
> our first genuine lawful Parliament.
>
> The restoration of our Constitutional Contract would also be a good time to
> restore the
> rightful role of judges and juries to all trials, and get rid of the
> unconstitutional
> 'adversary system' that has plagued British courts since it was set up by
> the
> moneylenders' agentur in the late 1700's to early 1800's. The adversary
> system was created
> solely on mercenary grounds to benefit the criminals and not the victims of
> crime. This
> little revolution is well described in Bret Dawson's book "The Evil Deeds
> of the Ratbag
> Profession". If you haven't seen it and are interested, it can be obtained
> by contacting
> Brett Dawson PO Box 32, Wombye, Queensland Australia 4559 Fax 07 5442
> 2373 email
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Regards,
> John
>
> <SNIP>
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is the Neither public email list, open for the public and general discussion.
To unsubscribe click here Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=unsubscribe
To subscribe click here Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=subscribe
For information on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.neither.org/lists/public-list.htm
For archives
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
