Dear Brian,
 
I appreciate the gesture.
 
My next court expense is to file in the High Court for leave to appeal against the Court of Appeal's decision (7th May) to dismiss my application for leave to appeal against Justice Sully's ruling that he, without a jury, would hear the Crown's Notice of Motion to dismiss my case for unlawful imprisonment - thereby preventing it getting to a jury for a jury to decide if Australians have the Right to Trial by Jury.
 
John.
-----Original Message-----
From: Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: John Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thursday, 10 May 2001 8:24
Subject: Re: Judicial Corruption, Bank Fraud & Trial by Jury.

Hi John
Good to hear from you.
This is news to me. It's the first time I have heard the post office question my stamp, which I acquired from them some time ago.
I am cutting your sixth tape as I write. I will send it today.
This will I believe complete your order of sis tapes.
Let me know if you receive them all OK.
John I know you have had a number of very large expenses lately, so I would like to take the opportunity to help you is some small way.
These first six tapes will therefore be free of charge.
Kind regards
Brian
----- Original Message -----
To: Brian
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 1:58 PM
Subject: Re: Judicial Corruption, Bank Fraud & Trial by Jury.

Dear Brian,
 
Thanks for the replacement video.
 
You had the Post office confused with your stamp (is it called "franking") but I was happy to pay on picking it up. They said they had never seen such a thing and the nearest to it was for the recipent to apply for a licence.
 
John.
-----Original Message-----
From: Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: John Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Monday, 7 May 2001 11:45
Subject: Re: Judicial Corruption, Bank Fraud & Trial by Jury.

Dear John
Thanks for the message John.
 
I have sent you some more videos. More in the mail today.
 
When I have snt you number six, as per your order, I will send you an invoice for the $100.00 as quoted.
Regards
Brian
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 4:26 PM
Subject: Judicial Corruption, Bank Fraud & Trial by Jury.

Dear Fellow Australians,
 
This morning in the Supreme Court of New South Wales was another evasion of trial by jury.
 
Justice David Kirby (brother of High Court's Justice Michael Kirby) was given the usual hammering about the necessity of trial by jury because, amongst many arguments, (a) s.3 of the 1900 Supreme Court Procedure Act says that only by "consent of both parties" can there be a judge without a jury, (b) pleadings of the Crown can only be tried by a jury, (c) no parliament can make a law to take away the rights of the people, (d) if a judge denies trial by jury then that is an offence punishable by 5 years imprisonment,  etc.,  etc.
 
I will get the transcript on the email as soon as it is to hand.
 
Justice Kirby ended by saying "I'm not denying you trial by jury.  Take it up on the day."
 
He set 19 July 2001 as the day for a "one-day" hearing of my case against the St. George Bank & the Crown where Justice Carolyn Simpson, on 4 August 1991, heard and, on 30 November 1991*, awarded a Writ of Possession without a jury against my constant insistance that she had no jurisdiction.  The Writ was exercised by the bank on 11 January 2001. We have since got the house back after getting $431,000 to the bank. Which, when added to the $230,000 + paid to the bank in the last 4 years, amounts to over $661,000 the St. George Bank acquired for them creating $380,000 "out of thin air".  The judges are concealing my evidence of the Reserve Bank of Australia's own figures that Australian banks create for themselves over $20 billion every year.  It really is the greatest swindle in the history of mankind, when one realizes that the banks are doing this all over the world.  The judiciary are co-conspirators because of their hyjacking the courts to protect these master criminals.
 
So, does anyone want to come to the Supreme Court at Queen's Square, Sydney on Thursday 19 July to see for themselves what sheer and total corruption is?  That's when all this will come to a head.  It's confrontation time.  The rights of the people -v- the power of the banks.
 
Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.  
 
* This is after, on 9 November 1999, Chief Judge at Common Law James Wood tried, convicted and sentenced me to "2 years imprisonment without parole" without a jury.  A  Court of Appeal released me after 3 months and 3 weeks but refused to overturn the conviction.  Now I am suing the Crown for unlawful imprisonment - and, again, the judges are denying me trial by jury.  That is in the Court of Appeal on this coming Monday, 7 May. 
JW.

Reply via email to