On Apr 3, 2008, at 6:41 PM, Mark Diggory wrote:
On Apr 3, 2008, at 10:42 AM, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
Because I feel this is a description of that resource, not a
description of a description of the resource. I'd like to be able
to say...
<rdf:RDF ... >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://dspace-test.mit.edu/handle/
1721.1/36383">
<dc:creator>Abelson, Harold</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Zittrain, Jonathan</dc:creator>
<ore:describes rdf:resource="http://dspace-test.mit.edu/handle/
1721.1/36383#aggregation"/>
</rdf:Description>
<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://dspace-test.mit.edu/handle/
1721.1/36383#aggregation">
<ore:aggregates rdf:resource="...."/>
<ore:aggregates rdf:resource="...."/>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
This looks good to me.
Thinking about this further...
/handle/1721.1/36383.rdf serves only RDF/XML.
and, would the resource in this rdf resolved by tacking on the file
extension contain the same URI as the example above based on the re-
negotiation above? I.E.
<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://dspace-test.mit.edu/handle/
1721.1/36383">
or would it be the location used to resolve the rdf?
<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://dspace-test.mit.edu/handle/
1721.1/36383.rdf">
I assume it would be the former?
-Mark
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Mark R. Diggory - DSpace Developer and Systems Manager
MIT Libraries, Systems and Technology Services
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
