On Apr 4, 2008, at 7:50 AM, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
On 4 Apr 2008, at 04:25, Mark Diggory wrote:
Thinking about this further...
/handle/1721.1/36383.rdf serves only RDF/XML.
and, would the resource in this rdf resolved by tacking on the
file extension contain the same URI as the example above based on
the re-negotiation above? I.E.
<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://dspace-test.mit.edu/
handle/1721.1/36383">
or would it be the location used to resolve the rdf?
<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://dspace-test.mit.edu/
handle/1721.1/36383.rdf">
I assume it would be the former?
Yes, I think that would be best, because if the URI is passed
around further, then clients can still get HTML or RDF depending on
their preferences.
Richard
Ok so now I have
http://dspace-test.mit.edu/metadata/handle/1721.1/29806/rdf.xml
and
'
http://dspace-test.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/29806
the later using content negotiation, the former is available via
default. They each contain "http://dspace-test.mit.edu/handle/
1721.1/29806" as the URI they are describing.
many thanks,
Mark
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Mark R. Diggory - DSpace Developer and Systems Manager
MIT Libraries, Systems and Technology Services
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
