Wolfgang Orthuber wrote:
After our dialogue of yesterday I again thought about the best term for the "pattern name" in http://www.orthuber.com/wp1.pdf which is simultaneously a identifier and a address. Because of chapter 2.1 of
http://www4.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/bizer/pub/LinkedDataTutorial/
the term  "http URI"  seems to be appropriate.
Yes.

We have seen, that a complete, precise, and at once accessible definition in exactly one place on the web can
be very helpful to avoid misunderstandings, and can save much time.

Certainly!
Therefore the identifier (the "pattern
name") should not only identify (e.g. the meaning of some numbers), is should also point to (a file which points to) all defining information (of this which should be identified, e.g. of numbers).
It should be a *conduit* to an associated information resource that exposes its constellation of defining characteristics :-)

Kingsley


If numeric web search (similarity search) should be integrated into the semantic web and/or if there is interest in efficient representation of quantifiable objects, I would suggest to determine the concrete design in a meeting, e.g. a workshop.

Wolfgang

----- Original Message ----- From: "Kingsley Idehen" <[email protected]>
To: "Wolfgang Orthuber" <[email protected]>
Cc: "Dan Brickley" <[email protected]>; "semantic-web" <[email protected]>; "Linked Data community"
<[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 4:57 PM
Subject: Re: numeric web search (Was: URLs instead of URNs)


Wolfgang Orthuber wrote:
We know that a URL refers to a (unique) web address. If also
A URL is a Web Address based Identifier
then the Web Address determines also the URL. Because the Web address is globally unique, the URL is unique
and can be used as unique identifier.
Is this correct?
The URL can be used as an Identifier because you can use a globally unique Resource Location/Address as a Name for a Thing (e.g. a Document), albeit with implications (i.e. mobility of the Thing you name).
(then I could write that the pattern name in http://www.orthuber.com/wp1.pdf is a URL, because it is based
on
the location of a unique "linking file" which points to all defining information)
<http://www.orthuber.com/wp1.pdf> is the Web Address constrained URI (nee. URL) for the resource: wp1.pdf exposed to the Web via an HTTP server. I've made no mention of "all defining information" .

Kingsley

Wolfgang

----- Original Message ----- From: "Kingsley Idehen" <[email protected]>
To: "Wolfgang Orthuber" <[email protected]>
Cc: "Dan Brickley" <[email protected]>; "semantic-web" <[email protected]>; "Linked Data community"
<[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 3:04 PM
Subject: Re: numeric web search (Was: URLs instead of URNs)


Wolfgang Orthuber wrote:
Dan,

can a http URI refer transiently or accidentally to some address?
Of course.
Which term do you suggest for something which permanently refers to a (unique, permanent) web address,
and
which differs if and only if the web address differs?
A URI that carries location/address specificity or dependency (transiently or accidentally).

An Identifier with endowed location specificity (overtly or covertly) isn't optimal, but that doesn't stop
it being an identifier.

A URL is a Web Address based Identifier -- a URI :-)



Kingsley

Wolfgang

----- Original Message ----- From: "Dan Brickley" <[email protected]>
To: "Wolfgang Orthuber" <[email protected]>
Cc: "semantic-web" <[email protected]>; "Linked Data community" <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 1:31 PM
Subject: Re: numeric web search (Was: URLs instead of URNs)


On 26/5/09 15:17, Wolfgang Orthuber wrote:
Dan,

in http://www.w3.org/TR/uri-clarification/ I read "An http URI is a URL" . So I concluded that a different http URI is a different URL (address). At this I assumed, that all http URIs which refer to the same address
(case insensitive), are defined as "identical". Is this correct?

I'd rather they'd have said "URL" is a technically obsolete but common colloquial term for http and http-like URIs. Identity of identifiers is tricky because you have to try to distinguish between identifiers which accidentally of transiently refer to the same thing, versus those where it is built-in to the definition of the scheme (eg. the port 80 and domain name canonicalisation rules).

Dan







--


Regards,

Kingsley Idehen       Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
President & CEO OpenLink Software     Web: http://www.openlinksw.com










--


Regards,

Kingsley Idehen       Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
President & CEO OpenLink Software     Web: http://www.openlinksw.com










--


Regards,

Kingsley Idehen       Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
President & CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com





Reply via email to