Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote:
On Tuesday 3. November 2009 21:53:09 Nathan wrote:
and.. sorry to keep asking!
Not at all! This is an interesting and important question, and you are
certainly not the only one who will face this problem.
topics
Foreign relations of Iran
Science and technology in Iran
Iran – United States relations
Politics of Iran
Nuclear program of Iran
Enriched uranium
people
Barack Obama
[...]
So, these are fairly broad topics, and this may (or may not), make it
somewhat easier on your side. I would like to point out that all the
categories of Wikipedia are modelled as skos:Concepts. If you are fortunate
enough to deal with only Wikipedia categories, I would do e.g.:
<http://yoursite.org/blog/he-could-do-it> dct:subject
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Barack_Obama> .
In some cases, you may not have a good category, but I believe that in many
cases, it may be just as useful to say
<http://yoursite.org/blog/allah-rulez> dct:subject
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Politics> ,
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Iran> .
as a more specific category.
If not, then you may have to go into the extra complexity of CommonTag or
MOAT, which may indeed be necessary in some cases.
Cheers,
Kjetil
makes sense to me.. also thinking that for the foreseeable future most
people will probably sparql on dct:subject (or simply a ?o of
dbpedia-URI).. imho people / common folks will ultimately query on what
they know, and they'll know what's in there templates and what they see
in source.. so for now the dublin core stuff probably rules.. unless one
of the others makes it in to XHTML+RDFa source big time over the next year.
also rel="tag" is of the utmost consideration (imho)
false logic?
