Dan Brickley wrote:
+cc: Ed Summers
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Chris Sizemore
<[email protected]> wrote:
the main problem is gonna be the cognitive dissonance over whether a tweet
is an information or non-information resource and how many URIs are needed
to fully rep a tweet...
so, who's gonna volunteer to publish the linked data version of Twitter
data, a la db/wiki[pedia] ...
Based on
http://blogs.loc.gov/loc/2010/04/how-tweet-it-is-library-acquires-entire-twitter-archive/
it looks like the Library of Congress might be taking on that job. And
on the strength of the LCSH RDF work, it might even be feasible...
Dan
All,
Remember: http://semantictwitter.appspot.com/ ?
--
Regards,
Kingsley Idehen
President & CEO
OpenLink Software
Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
