After some heated debate after the backlash against me for my recent comments about PDF, I've been forced to shift to recommending PDF as the preferred format for the data.southampton.ac.uk site, both for publishing and importing data.


If today wasn't April Fool's Day I would have been worried. Nice one, Chris.


Cheers,
        Michael
--
Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow
LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
Ireland, Europe
Tel. +353 91 495730
http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
http://sw-app.org/about.html

On 1 Apr 2011, at 08:23, Christopher Gutteridge wrote:

After some heated debate after the backlash against me for my recent comments about PDF, I've been forced to shift to recommending PDF as the preferred format for the data.southampton.ac.uk site, both for publishing and importing data.

There are some issues with this and I know not every one will be happy with the decision; it wasn't easy to make... but on reflection, however, it's the right one. It is much easier for non programmers (the majority of people) to work with PDF documents and they are supported by pretty much every platform you can think of with a choice of tools and the benefit of familiarity.

We've provided a wrapper around 4store to make PDF the default output mode: http://sparql.data.southampton.ac.uk/?query=PREFIX+soton%3A+%3Chttp%3A%2F%2Fid.southampton.ac.uk%2Fns%2F%3E%0D%0APREFIX+foaf%3A+%3Chttp%3A%2F%2Fxmlns.com%2Ffoaf%2F0.1%2F%3E%0D%0APREFIX+skos%3A+%3Chttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2004%2F02%2Fskos%2Fcore%23%3E%0D%0APREFIX+geo%3A+%3Chttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2003%2F01%2Fgeo%2Fwgs84_pos%23%3E%0D%0APREFIX+rdfs%3A+%3Chttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2000%2F01%2Frdf-schema%23%3E%0D%0APREFIX+org%3A+%3Chttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2Fns%2Forg%23%3E%0D%0APREFIX+spacerel%3A+%3Chttp%3A%2F%2Fdata.ordnancesurvey.co.uk%2Fontology%2Fspatialrelations%2F%3E%0D%0APREFIX+ep%3A+%3Chttp%3A%2F%2Feprints.org%2Fontology%2F%3E%0D%0APREFIX+dct%3A+%3Chttp%3A%2F%2Fpurl.org%2Fdc%2Fterms%2F%3E%0D%0APREFIX+bibo%3A+%3Chttp%3A%2F%2Fpurl.org%2Fontology%2Fbibo%2F%3E%0D%0APREFIX+owl%3A+%3Chttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2002%2F07%2Fowl%23%3E%0D%0A%0D%0ASELECT+%3Fs+WHERE+ {%0D%0A++++%3Fs+%3Fp+%3Fo+.%0D%0A}+LIMIT +10&output=pdf&jsonp=#results_table

And most information URIs can now be resolved to PDF, but we are sticking to HTML as the default (for now)
http://data.southampton.ac.uk/products-and-services/FreshFruit.pdf

The full details and rationale are on our data blog
http://blogs.ecs.soton.ac.uk/data/2011/04/01/pdf-selected-as-interchange-format/E

--
Christopher Gutteridge -- http://id.ecs.soton.ac.uk/person/1248

You should read the ECS Web Team blog: http://blogs.ecs.soton.ac.uk/webteam/





Reply via email to