> In fact, I think the better pattern would be to use the "link" element:
OTTOMH, <link> is only allowed in the header, not in the body, hence not the best option. Cheers, Michael On 14 Jun 2011, at 21:14, "Martin Hepp" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Stéphane, > thanks! > > In fact, I think the better pattern would be to use the "link" element: > >> >> <div itemscope itemtype="http://www.foo.com/Type1"; >> itemid="http://acme.org/things#1> >> <link itemprop="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type"; >> href="http://www.foo.com/Type2"; /> >> </div> > > > Martin > > On Jun 13, 2011, at 6:30 PM, Stéphane Corlosquet wrote: > >> Martin, all, >> >> I wrote a blog post summarizing the challenges of using multiple >> vocabularies in microdata, which includes Martin's snippet as well as >> another snippet I was given on #whatwg earlier last week. >> >> http://openspring.net/blog/2011/06/10/microdata-multiple-vocabularies >> >> Steph. >> >> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 6:57 PM, Stéphane Corlosquet <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> Hi Martin, >> >> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Martin Hepp >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> Dear all: >> >> Until today, I had assumed that one limitation of Microdata was that it did >> not support more than one class per item, e.g. that you could not state that >> something was e.g. the intersection of >> >> http://www.productontology.org/id/Hammer >> and >> http://purl.org/goodrelations/v1#Individual >> >> which, in the context of GoodRelations, means that it is an actual hammer >> (like in describing antiques or other unique items). >> >> Now, reconsidering the issue, I am no longer convinced that this is valid >> criticism, because you could use the full URI for rdf:type with itemprop: >> >> <div itemscope itemtype="http://www.foo.com/Type1"; >> itemid="http://acme.org/things#1> >> <a itemprop="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type"; >> href="http://www.foo.com/Type2";></a> >> </div> >> >> >> This should result in >> >> <http://acme.org/things#1> a <http://www.foo.com/Type1>, >> <http://www.foo.com/Type2> . >> >> or am I mistaken? >> >> I believe you are correct, and according to the Live Microdata tool, it >> yields the expected results. here is the link (click on the turtle tab): >> http://j.mp/iUH2FS >> >> Steph. >> >> >> Best >> Martin Hepp >> >> >> >> > >
