On 18 Jun 2011, at 08:13, AzamatAbdoullaev wrote:

> HS: "I gave a talk on the philosophy of the Social Web if you are interested."
>  http://www.slideshare.net/bblfish/philosophy-and-the-social-web-5583083
>  
> For the specifics of TBL's motto, "the web as a philosophical engineering", 
> see Harry's article:
> http://www.apaonline.org/publications/newsletters/v07n2_Computers_04.aspx
> Some interesting assertions: "we are not analyzing a world, we are building 
> it. We are not experimental philosophers, we are philosophical engineers." ; 
> "online intelligence is generated through complex causal interaction in an 
> extended brain-body-environment system"; "The Web is ...the creation and 
> evolution of external representations in a universal information space".
> I'd extend: if the the world wide web is "a universal information space", the 
> semantic/ontological web is a universal knowledge space.
> And we need avoid confusing four fields: philosophical engineering, 
> philosophy of engineering, engineering philosophy, and engineering of 
> philosophy.

The recent discussions on this list were very much about how to avoid making 
distinctions unless you have to (Just-In-Time Distinctions?) So why are the 
above distinctions needed? Particularly with regard to this conversation.


> Azamat
>  
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Henry Story
> To: adasal
> Cc: Lin Clark ; Bjoern Hoehrmann ; Linked Data community ; Semantic Web
> Sent: Friday, June 17, 2011 8:48 PM
> Subject: Re: Hackers - Re: Schema.org considered helpful
> 
> 
> On 17 Jun 2011, at 19:27, adasal wrote:
> 
>> That said the hacker is a various beast,
> 
> Indeed, hackers are not angels. But the people on this list should get back 
> to hacking or work together with open source projects to get initial minimal 
> working pieces embedded there. WebID is one; foaf is another, pingback, 
> access control, ...
> Get the really simple pieces working.
> 
>> and I wonder if this sort of thing can really be addressed without 
>> overarching political/ethical/idealogical concerns. It's tough. 
> 
> It all fits together really nicely. I gave a talk on the philosophy of the 
> Social Web if you are interested.
>  http://www.slideshare.net/bblfish/philosophy-and-the-social-web-5583083
> 
> Hackers tend to be engineers with a political attitude, so they are more 
> receptive to the bigger picture. But solving the big picture problem should 
> have an easy entry cost if we want to get it going. 
> 
> I talked to the BBC but they have limited themselves to what they will do in 
> the Social Web space as far as profile hosting goes. Again, I'd start small. 
> Facebook started in universities not that long ago.
> 
> Henry
> 
> 
> Social Web Architect
> http://bblfish.net/
> 
> 

Social Web Architect
http://bblfish.net/

Reply via email to