On 24 March 2012 10:20, Dave Reynolds <[email protected]> wrote:
> BTW the fact that AFAIK there is no broadly used URI for the class of IRs > (causing me to use foaf:Document in the above) may indicate how frequently > people do in fact make the httpRange-14 inference in a way that is > accessible to the rest of the stack. I'd suggest the reason there's no broadly used URI for such a class, is that there is no coherently defined class that plausibly divides up the world into IRs and non-IRs. If we had consensus on the latter, and if it were a useful distinction, I'm sure there'd be a class for it by now. Dan
