2012/3/23 Melvin Carvalho <[email protected]>: > > > 2012/3/23 Giovanni Tummarello <[email protected]> >> >> 2012/3/23 Sergio Fernández <[email protected]>: >> > Do you really think that base your proposal on the usage on a Powder >> > annotation is a good idea? >> > >> > Sorry, but IMHO HttpRange-14 is a good enough agreement. >> >> yup performed brilliantly so far, nothing to say. Industry is flocking >> to adoption, and what a consensus. > > > +1 > > 'Brilliantly' is an understatement :) > > And we're probably still only towards the beginning of the adoption cycle! > > I dont think, even the wildest optimist, could have predicted the success of > the current architecture (both pre and post HR14).
Oh dear, so now I don't know any more if Gio was being saracastic! Linked Data is a brilliant success, despite the burden of http-range-14. Is a SKOS Concept an Information Resource? Must its URIs 303 redirect? Is a # pointing into an RDFa page OK? We don't make this stuff easy. http-range-14 has long been an embarrassment. Just now all the critics get invited to try to do a better job, which isn't as easy as it looks :) Dan
