On 25/03/12 19:24, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
Tim,Alternatively, why not use the existing "Link:" header? Then we end up with the ability to express the same :describedby relation in three places
Which is, of course, in the now-submitted proposal. Dave
On 25/03/12 19:24, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
Tim,Alternatively, why not use the existing "Link:" header? Then we end up with the ability to express the same :describedby relation in three places
Which is, of course, in the now-submitted proposal. Dave