On 3/26/12 3:57 AM, Dave Reynolds wrote:
On 25/03/12 19:24, Kingsley Idehen wrote:Tim, Alternatively, why not use the existing "Link:" header? Then we end up with the ability to express the same :describedby relation in three placesWhich is, of course, in the now-submitted proposal. Dave
Yes, and I only found that out yesterday as you'll see from my thread with Jonathan :-)
-- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder& CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
