Hi Brad, Maybe you already knew about this but I would edit the dataset from CKAN adding the lodcloud.needsfixing tag as explained in [1] saying the dataset is no longer available. Replacing the site by a WS returning a 410 makes sense for me and I can assume that CKAN people will remove it from the LOD asap given these two conditions.
Best Iker [1] http://www4.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/lodcloud/ckan/validator/levels.html#level4 2012/5/28 Bradley Allen <[email protected]> > Back in 2009, as an experiment in working with RDFa and linked data, I > created t4gm.info. It is based solely on US Library of Congress library > linked data (specifically, the Thesaurus for Graphical Materials), which at > the time I created the site didn't have any equivalently accessible linked > data. That has long since been rectified by the LoC. So t4gm.info is at > best redundant and at worst potentially confusing. > > So what I want to do is shut the site down. But there doesn't seem to be > much if any best practice around doing that, especially when the site by > virtue of its listing with CKAN is part of the LOD Cloud diagram. What I > want to do is 1) delist it from CKAN, and then 2) shut the site down, > perhaps replacing it with a simple web service returning a 410 status code > per RFC 2616. I assume it will be removed from the LOD cloud diagram when > that is next updated from the CKAN data. > > Anyone have any suggestions beyond that? Also, if anyone from CKAN is > reading this, I could also use some guidance on how deletion of records is > accomplished through the online interface. - cheers, BPA > > Bradley P. Allen > http://bradleypallen.org > -- Iker Huerga http://www.ikerhuerga.com/
