On 31 May 2012 00:12, Richard Cyganiak <[email protected]> wrote: > Bradley, > > On 30 May 2012, at 23:03, Bradley Allen wrote: >> I'm regret to say that I'd already nuked the CKAN record by the time this >> email reached me > > CKAN doesn't actually nuke things that are deleted, it just hides them from > view and they can be restored, which I just did for the t4gm dataset: > > http://thedatahub.org/dataset/t4gm-info
Exactly - as per my email just now I wonder if we want a state of "archived" separate from "deleted" for this. "Deleted" items can get purged which is not what is wanted here. > Please update the record to reflect the fact that it's now only a “tombstone” > for some data that is no longer available. > > We also need some way to mark this for the LOD Cloud. How about adopting a > new tag “lodcloud.tombstone”? ;-) rufus
