On 6/26/12 10:21 AM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
Doesn't have anything to do with the means of access control, does it?These are people who, given the option to secure their updates, have chosen to disregard it and post them publicly.Users you opt out of default privacy settings rather than being to told to opt-in as an after thought :-)We are looking at the same old "cat and mouse" game re. "you" the product and free social media services. Service providers need to pay for those massive data centers that drive their social media services, at the same time, they dare not price these services at anything greater than $0.00.Kingsley
Barry, Meant to say:Users *should* opt out of default privacy settings rather than being to told to opt-in as an after thought
-- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
