The W3C has lots of guidance, um ... words, on the subject. Is it in Swedish ? I don't think I know Swedish, I'll check.
http://www.w3.org/TR/tracking-dnt/ http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-tracking-compliance-20120313/ ________________________________ From: David Wood <[email protected]> To: Gannon Dick <[email protected]> Cc: Melvin Carvalho <[email protected]>; Linked Data community <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 9:44 AM Subject: Re: The possible dangers of linked open data? HI Gannon, I like it! Now, we only need to fight Facebook, etc, to make sure they allow users to maintain separation from idiots... Regards, Dave On Jun 26, 2012, at 10:33, Gannon Dick wrote: Good advice, Dr. Wood, but Linked Data methods entail the collation of positive assertions. > > >So, for example, the late Lane Kirkland's late dad's advice: >“My pappy told me never to bet my bladder against a brewery or get into an >argument with people who buy ink by the barrel.” >might be updated for the FB age as > > ><b>[...] You have the right to maintain Six Degrees of Separation from >Idiots</b> > > >Assuming that a father's advice is semantically congruent. There do seem to >be some counter-examples in the wild, however. > > > > >________________________________ > From: David Wood <[email protected]> >To: Melvin Carvalho <[email protected]> >Cc: Linked Data community <[email protected]> >Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 9:01 AM >Subject: Re: The possible dangers of linked open data? > > >On Jun 26, 2012, at 09:49, Melvin Carvalho wrote: > > >http://www.weknowwhatyouredoing.com/ >> > >Yep. My father's advice ("Avoid being an idiot in public") still applies on >the Internet. Go figure. > > >Regards, >Dave > > > >
