On 7/30/12 8:11 AM, Melvin Carvalho wrote:


On 26 July 2012 00:08, Kingsley Idehen <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    All,

    There is a tendency assume an eternal lack of functional and
    scalable business models with regards to Linked Data. I think its
    time for an open discussion about this matter.

    It's no secret, I've never seen business models as challenging
    Linked Data. Quite the contrary. That said, instead of a dump from
    me about my viewpoints on Linked Data models, how about starting
    this discussion by identifying any non "Advertising based business
    model" that have actually worked on the Web to date.

    As far as I know, "Advertising" and "Surreptitious Personal
    Profile Data Wholesale" are the only models that have made a
    difference to the bottom lines of: Google, Facebook, Twitter,
    Yahoo! and other non eCommerce oriented behemoths.

    Based on the above, let's have a serious and frank discussion
    about business models with the understanding agreement that one
    size will never fit all, ever, so this rule cannot be overlooked
    re. Linked Data. Also remember, Business models aren't silver
    bullets, they are typically aligned with markets (qualified and
    quantified pain points) and the evolving nature of tangible and
    monetizable value.

    Hopefully, the floor is now open to everyone that has a vested
    interest in this very important matter :-)


I think we need a paid app store for the web

Plenty of examples of people writing apps, deploying them to mobile and making good revenue

Why should it not be as easy to deploy to 'The Web'

Great point!

A webby application store driven by the likes of GoodRelations, FOAF Profiles, SIOC data spaces, WebID ACLs, and Payswarm is something that's missing re. poweful Linked Data showcase outside the realms of dataset publishing. Imagine if developers could produce Linked Data apps for desktops, notebooks, tables, and phones that were easy to discover, courtesy of the kind of serendipity inherent in Web-scale Linked Data meshes. Basically, you end up with something as simple as:

Developer Activity:

1. write app
2. describe app -- using something as simple as a turtle document
3. deploy app to a Web location -- e.g., dropbox or an ftp location
4. ACL protect access to the app via WebID
5. use WebID watermarked X.509 certificate as the license file which enforces terms of use
6. announce app via a Tweet, G+, Facebook, LinkedIn post.

Note: this system would be federated and endowed with a SPARQL endpoint giving developers the option to maintain their own app stores etc.. In addition, existing App stores that offer APIs would be hooked into the system via wrapper / proxy services that produce Linked Data etc..

Very cool idea!



--
    Regards,

    Kingsley Idehen
    Founder & CEO
    OpenLink Software
    Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
    Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
    <http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/%7Ekidehen>
    Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
    Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
    LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen








--

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen 
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen




Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to